Quantcast The Collegian
College Media Network

The Collegian

Reject conspiracy and Judeophobia

Mark Perkins

Issue date: 3/5/09 Section: Opinion
  • Print
  • Email
In his opinions piece, Raymond Spiotta ostensibly defends the free speech of Holocaust deniers, but in so doing he indulges in their pseudo-historical gibberish. His assumption that the opponents of Holocaust denial "have never paused to examine the factual basis for that dogma of theirs" reveals his susceptibility to the propaganda of Judeophobes (a better term than the problematic "anti-Semite"). Historians do debate exactly how many millions of Jews, Catholics and other "undesirables" Hitler's Third Reich annihilated. But Bishop Williamson's crank opinion that there was no Holocaust and that the Third Reich used no gas chambers does not merit serious consideration. He is the ignorant voice of radical Judeophobia shouting against the overwhelming weight of historical and scientific evidence.

Spiotta's apparently harmless defense of free speech serves as an introduction; soon the article gives way to Judeophobia, Zionist conspiracy theories and even an implicit denial of the Holocaust. Yet the milder claims about free speech also reveal a lack of historical understanding - and truth through understanding is what history ultimately pursues. I absolutely agree that, in the abstract, free speech ought to extend to Judeophobia, but Spiotta's castigation of these silly Europeans for their emotional and legal reactions against Holocaust denial ignores the drastic difference between his American perspective and that of contemporary Germans. He argues that Germans should be able to speak of the Holocaust in the same way they speak of Russian gulags, atheism, and the color of the sky. But the German nation was not complicit in the gulags, and one cannot compare atheism or the color of the sky to the extinction of a people group from an entire continent based solely on their race. Germany is less than 70 years removed from that abomination, yet Spiotta has more sympathy for the wild untruths of Holocaust deniers than he does for Germans struggling under the weight of an unimaginable national shame.
Page 1 of 2 next >

Article Tools

The Collegian welcomes comments. We discourage drive-by attacks and idle chatter, and accept civil, original statements which contribute to the discussion at hand. You must sign your own name to your comment. If you impersonate someone else, we will delete your comment. Feel free to attack a person's argument, but not to attack any person, whether article author, editor, or another comment poster. Comments with excessive profanity, lies, misinformation, personal attacks or obscenity will be removed. So will comments which contribute nothing to public discourse, or are so riddled with spelling or grammar errors they are difficult to read.

Viewing Comments 1 - 7 of 8

MARK PERKINS SUCKS

posted 3/05/09 @ 6:31 PM EST

Mark you completely rely on ad hominum attacks in your work.... you attack the person without even looking at any of the evidence. It is a sign of a weak mind and weak arguing skills. (Continued…)

(1 reply)   Details   Reply to this comment

amused

posted 3/06/09 @ 12:07 AM EST

"simply go to google and type in "holocaust denier" and you will see how easy it is to find accurate information about the truth..."

LOL. seriously?

Old man who always attends the CCAs

posted 3/07/09 @ 12:23 PM EST

Mark Perkins FTW!

Raymond Spiotta

posted 3/09/09 @ 11:37 PM EST

Just for the record, when I quoted Mein Kampf at the end, I did not intend to identify the Holocaust story itself as Hitler's kind of big lie.

I meant to suggest that the way governments and media treat that story bears a marked semblance to propogandistic techniques in totalitarian regimes. (Continued…)

Fact Checker

posted 3/10/09 @ 12:12 AM EST

You need to get your facts straight about Bishop Williamson. Bishop Williamson never said there wasn't a holocaust. Rather, he said only 200,000 to 300,000 Jews were killed in the Holocaust. (Continued…)

Calvin

posted 3/11/09 @ 6:04 PM EST

Oh sure, he doesn't deny the Holocaust....he just denies 95% of it. Big difference!

Norton

posted 3/13/09 @ 5:11 PM EST

It's one thing to hate Jews, quite another to deny a historical truth (whatever its dimension). The first may, in fact, have some rational bases; the latter must be totally irrational. (Continued…)

Post a Comment

  • NOTE: Email address will not be published

Type your comment below (html not allowed)

  I understand posting spam or other comments that are unrelated to this article will cause my comment to be flagged for deletion and possibly cause my IP address to be permanently banned from this server.

Issue Summary

Advertisement








Advertisement